Highly Rated Lawyers With a Reputation. We Fight For Workers Who Are Harassed, Wrongfully Fired, Injured, or Disabled. LET US HELP YOU! Call Today 1-800-CANT-WORK
The Law Offices of Eric A. Shore, PC is a law firm dedicated to representing Social Security Disability, Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation, Employment Law, and Civil Rights claims. Our staff of experienced attorneys have worked in the Social Security system for many years and can help people anywhere in the nation. We also have a Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation, Employment Law, and Civil Rights Department that handle cases in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Over the past 21 years we have represented over 40,000 individuals in pursuit of their claims. Our firm understands that disabled clients have difficulty travelling and allows clients to retain the firm using the telephone, mail and internet. There is NEVER a fee or cost UNTIL YOU WIN!.
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 6 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.2 or higher.
Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Avvo Top Contributor
This award is granted to attorneys who have significantly contributed to Avvo.com by answering questions in the Q&A forum, publishing legal guides, or other meaningful contributions to the Avvo community.
Avvo Client's Choice
This award is granted to attorneys with at least 5 reviews with 4+ stars in a given year on Avvo.com.
About Awards
Client Champion Awards
Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity
and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service.
Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.
At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.
At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.
Law Offices of Eric A. Shore got this award in 2021
At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale Peer Awards
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious
Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Law Offices of Eric A. Shore got this award in 2021
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Avvo Awards
Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A,
publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.
Law Offices of Eric A. Shore got this award in 2021
Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.
Law Offices of Eric A. Shore got this award in 2021
Eric helped me to better understand how Social Security work and all that applies to getting my disability.He was very insightful and understanding when I asked crazy questions.
Social Security
Posted by anonymous
October 07, 2013
Hired Law Firm
they have bilingual services. They have service and return phone calls 24/7.
I RECEIVED EXCELLENT ADVICE AND SUPPORT IN THE PREPARATION OF MY CASE. mOST INTERACTIONS OCCURRED OVER THE PHONE WHICH MEETS MY NEEDS AS I DO NOT OWN A CAR AT THIS TIME. However, I was disappointed at the time my case was discussed before the judge. There was a six month gap of my personal history and treatment that the office failed to send to the judge. Those six months were vital to my case as they revealed current status of treatment.
They turned me down even when i had more than enough evidence and witnesses to get a case and win big against my former employer that committed defamation discrimination on my work record. Appointed me an inexperienced associate who foolishly said "its ok" for a race baiting superior to defame a caucasian. If you are also broke and poor, don't waste your time. The consultation was free but the fact they still turned me down with all evidence and witnesses proves they nothing more nothing less than driven by greed! Their poor excuse of a response to my review is better than ignorance, right?
Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.
The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.
Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page
Martindale Peer Reviews
Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.
The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.
What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*
• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.
Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.
Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.