Taylor is a member of the Professional Liability Department where she focuses her practice on the defense of public entities, public officials, municipal and county governments, and school districts in the areas of employment law and civil rights.
Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey as an associate, Taylor served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Craig A. Ambrose, J.S.C. in Burlington County, where she gained experience in both the Family and Criminal Divisions. Upon completion of the clerkship term, she worked for a family law firm in New Jersey.
A graduate of Widener University Delaware Law School, Taylor made the Dean's List during the Fall 2021 and Fall 2022 semesters for her exceptional academic performance. Additionally, she earned a Pro Bono distinction for her involvement in the Veterans' Law Clinic, where she provided free legal representation to primarily low-income and disabled veterans and their dependents. Taylor also received Certificates of Achievement in Disability Law and Legal Problem Solving.
Taylor is admitted to practice in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and the U.S. District Court of New Jersey.
Outside of her work at Marshall Dennehey, she enjoys various hobbies including spending time with her dog.
Thought Leadership
Legal Updates for New Jersey Public Entity & Civil Rights
Unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court Holds That Personal Emails of Public Employees and Officials are Subject to OPRA
June 17, 2026
In Rosetti v. Ramapo-Indian Hills Regional High School Board of Education, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously held that government-related emails, which are contained within personal email accounts, are government records under the Open Public Records Act (OPRA), and a log of those emails must be produced when requested.In reaching this decision, the court conducted an analysis of the OPRA and cited previous cases that held that emails do in fact fall within OPRA’s definition of a record and must be produced when requested pursuant to the Act. The court in Rosetti then had to answer the question as to whether public officials’ personal email accounts that are used for government purposes are subject to OPRA, and found that they are.Rosetti made an OPRA request to the Board of Education seeking email logs from Board members’ personal email accounts. The Board refused to produce the logs and indicated that it was not under any obligation to produce personal email account logs, only from government-related email accounts. The issue was whether a log had to be produced for Board members’ personal email accounts, which they used to conduct Board business. The Board argued that while it was possible to create a log for government-related email accounts through its IT Department, it was not possible to do so for personal email accounts. The court rejected this argument and ruled that Board members are required to search their personal email accounts and create a log of government-related emails housed in those accounts. Once completed, each Board member then must submit a certification detailing the searches that were conducted.The court went one step further with a suggestion to government employees and officials, stating, “[g]overnment agencies should strongly advise their employees, elected officials, and others engaged in government-related business to refrain from using their personal email accounts when conducting government-related business.” Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding this case and others pertaining to the OPRA.
