×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
John J. Gilligan
Pro

John J. Gilligan

4.0
29 reviews

One World Trade Center, Suite 1740, Long Beach, CA 90831

Family Law and Divorce

About John J. Gilligan

John J. Gilligan practices at Gilligan Frisco Trutanich & Sarris, LLP

Read Full Bio

John J. Gilligan (Long Beach, California) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

John J. Gilligan got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for John J.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.0
See All Reviews
29
1.0
Lawyers.com
2
4.6
Martindale
12
3.9
Avvo
15
Showing 1-2 of 2 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
100%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
1.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Responsiveness
1.0
Value for Money
1.0
Family Law
Posted by anonymous
August 05, 2023
Hired Attorney

Gives divorce attorneys a bad name. Expensive and useless. Avoid. Will use your children as weapons. Horrible. Ineffective is an understatement. He should be disbarred. Will expose your unredacted personal finances, tax returns and social security numbers in court papers.

Family Law
Posted by anonymous
June 18, 2020
Hired Attorney

Working with this lawyer made me understand why divorce lawyers are such a maligned bunch. John Joseph Gilligan is the epitome of a heartless, fee-churning, useless-letter-writing, impotent, expensive lawyer. His signal skill is to ferret out creative ways to add billable minutes. His worst failure is failure to be honest and to actually advocate for his client. He listened to my whole story, and only once I'd gotten an attorney fee award and was able to hire him did he inform me that I should have known better than to believe my father-in-law, back then, when he told us (Wife and I) that the large gifts coming our way were really only intented for his biological relative (his daughter), a notion that I first heard about only once Wife had filed for divorce. He thought it normal, or futile to discuss in court, that a child would reject a parent; that children should stay with their mother if she doesn't want to "share." Avoid at all costs. Mendacious to the core.

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Family Law 1
    • Divorce

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Accepted Credit Cards
    Other
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Founding Partner
    Firm Name
    Gilligan Frisco Trutanich & Sarris, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    In re Willard, 15 B.R. 898
    In re Raiton, 139 B.R. 931
    IRMO Cordero, 97 CA App.4th 956, 118 CR2d 833
    Marriage of Lucio (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, Case No. G039072).
  • Additional Links
    http://www.GFTLawyers.com https://www.bgdlawyers.com/our-team/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1981, California
    1986, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Tax Court
    1981, U.S. District Court, Central and Northern Districts of California
    Bar Fellowship
    Author: "The Need for a Legal Expert in Dividing & Distributing Your Pension Upon Death or Divorce," The Reporter, Vol. 78, No. 61, August 3, 1999. Judge Pro-Tem Superior and Municipal Courts for Domestic Violence, Family Law Calendar, 1986-. Mediator, Family Law in Superior Court, 1986-. Panel for Minor's Counsel, Los Angeles and Orange County, 1994-. Volunteer, Domestic Violence and Guardianship Workshop, Los Angeles Superior Court. Trained Mediator, (2002-), Pepperdine University School of Law and California Academy of Mediation Professionals "Mediating the Litigated Case" Fall 2002.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Western State University
    Class of 1980
    J.D.
    Other Education
    State University of New York
    Class of 1976
    B.S.
    Legal Certifications
    Certified Specialist, Family Law, The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1954
    Queens, New York, March 19, 1954

Activity

Email John J. Gilligan

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Does this attorney maintain a professional presence on any social networks?
    Yes, John J. Gilligan has a professional profile on LinkedIn, facebook and Twitter.
  • Does this attorney maintain a presence in more than one law firm?
    John J. Gilligan is affiliated with Gilligan Frisco Trutanich & Sarris, LLP and Gilligan Law Corporation.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.