×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Kenneth Eade
Pro

Kenneth Eade

5.0
87 reviews

9350 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 203, Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Internet Law, International Law, Intellectual Property and 2 more

About Kenneth Eade

I founded AMZ Sellers Attorney® after building and running my own seven-figure Amazon FBA business — so when a seller calls me about a suspension, a frozen payout, or an IP complaint, I've been on their side of Seller Central. I've been a California attorney since 1980 (Bar No. 93774) and a published KDP author since 2013, with more than 20 novels on the platform, which is why our firm runs one of the only dedicated KDP and ACX account termination practices in the country.

My firm represents online sellers, brands, and publishers in: Amazon suspension appeals and Section 3 deactivation defense; ASIN reinstatement; Vendor Central, Relay, Merch by Amazon, and Mechanical Turk appeals; KDP and ACX terminations and royalty holds; Walmart, eBay, Etsy, TikTok Shop, Temu, Target, PayPal, and X account appeals; AAA and ICDR arbitration against Amazon for frozen funds (over $20 million recovered); Schedule A lawsuit and federal TRO defense; trademark registration, TTAB oppositions and cancellations, and trademark expungement; IP complaint defense and DMCA matters; Brand Registry enforcement and hijacker removal; and California Proposition 65 defense. My co-counsel Michael S. Brandt, a USPTO-registered patent attorney with 25+ years of experience, handles patent prosecution, Amazon APEX evaluations, non-infringement analysis, and reexamination.

The firm is listed first in Sermondo's Top 10 Ecommerce Lawyers, holds an A+ BBB rating with a 4.6-star average across 610 third-party reviews, and has been quoted in Bloomberg Law. Consultations are free: amazonsellers.attorney or +1-424-285-5192.

 

Kenneth Eade (Beverly Hills, California) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
Avvo Client's Choice
This award is granted to attorneys with at least 5 reviews with 4+ stars in a given year on Avvo.com.
Avvo Client Choice

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Kenneth Eade got this award in 2021

Reviews for Kenneth

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
87
5.0
Lawyers.com
1
Martindale
Not yet reviewed
5.0
Avvo
86
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Internet Law
Posted by anonymous
September 05, 2017
Hired Attorney

"Absolutely life-saving service from Ken! When you Amazon listing goes down, he is the person to help you our, write a compelling and professional appeal that works. In my case, within an hour, the listing was back up, really amazing! Kenneth is easy to work with, professional, and knows his stuff! I recommend him highly!"

From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Internet Law
  • International Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution 1
    • Arbitration
  • Other 1
    • e commerce

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
    French
    Russian
    Spanish
    Turkish
    Arabic
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates: $400 - $500/hr
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Other
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    IP and E commerce lawyer
    Firm Name
    AMZ Sellers Attorney
  • Additional Links
    https://www.amazonsellers.attorney/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1980, California
    2012, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Memberships
    Ventura County Bar Association
    State Bar of California.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Southwestern University School of Law
    Class of 1980
    J.D.
    Other Education
    California State University at Northridge
    Class of 1977
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1957
    December 29, 1957

Activity

Email Kenneth Eade

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Kenneth Eade was admitted in 1980 to the State of California.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Kenneth Eade is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
  • Does this attorney speak any other languages?
    Kenneth Eade speaks French, Russian, Spanish, Turkish and Arabic.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Client Review rated?
    Yes, Kenneth Eade has a 5.0 Client Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Kenneth Eade attended Southwestern University School of Law.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.